 |
 |
|
 |
|  Balancing and optimizing trade facilitation and border integrityStrategies to simultaneously balance and optimize the twin goals of trade facilitation for economic development and enhanced border integrity to protect national interests and public safety will help Customs agencies achieve long-term success. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

IBM Institute for Business Value study Last updated: 22 May 2003
 | Summary |  |
A complex set of external drivers influence the modernization strategies for Customs agencies. The heightened focus on physical security threats and transnational crime affects operational priorities. The private sector expects Customs to improve clearance efficiencies and reduce the burden of trade to support their integrated, just-in-time supply chain requirements. Increased global trade and international travel strains the current Customs infrastructure, procedures and available resources. Rapid advances in technology available to Customs agencies push investments to replace antiquated systems with more sophisticated tools and processes. Agency missions are rapidly expanding to manage these complex processes, organization and technology challenges. However, to achieve long term success, modernization approaches need to focus on creating stakeholder value in this dynamic environment -- not just pursue ad hoc, non-value added projects. These approaches focus on developing strategies to simultaneously balance and optimize the twin goals of trade facilitation for economic development and enhanced border integrity to protect national interests and public safety. |
 | Analysis |  |
The dynamic, global economic, political and security setting creates multi- dimensional charters and complex management challenges for Customs agencies. Increasing trade volumes -- a necessary component for economic growth -- complicates the traditional compliance mission of regulatory enforcement and revenue collection. In addition to the normal roles, many Customs agencies have been given responsibility to administer all indirect taxes, including value-added tax (VAT) and excise duties. Political leaders are further looking for Customs to become more involved with managing physical security threats. Added organizational complexity also exists because Customs work often requires strong working relationships with multiple private sector parties, as well as collaborative interactions with other government agencies. Combining this environment with stagnant levels of human and financial resources often forces Customs leaders into difficult operational decisions. While the influence of these factors varies by national priorities and sophistication of current systems, these challenges all center on resolving a key strategic question: How does Customs simultaneously balance and optimize the twin goals of trade facilitation and border integrity? Balance requires involving the various stakeholders and making resource trade-offs within program areas. Optimization requires focus on high-value producing areas and collaboration with other government departments and private sector partners. In a survey of global Customs leaders, the IBM Institute for Business Value found that Customs agencies think they can achieve an appropriate balance for these goals, given their individual national priorities and economic objectives. However, they struggle to simultaneously improve both goals. To read the complete study, download the PDF at the top of this page. |
 About the authors Bryan Barton Bryan Barton is a partner in the IBM Business Consulting Services organization based in the Washington, D.C. area. He is responsible for IBM solutions for government tax, customs and ports, and works with governments around the world.
|
Jeremy Andrulis Jeremy Andrulis is the public sector lead at the IBM Institute for Business Value. He helps governments at all levels identify innovative strategies for successfully managing transformation.
|
 |
| Related reports & papers |
|
|
 |
| Related services & products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|