Skip to main content

Imperfect harmony: Alliances within the life sciences industry

Partnerships are vital to large biopharmaceutical companies - and yet many lack the collaborative capabilities they need. This study outlines the characteristics biotechs and academics are looking for in a partner and suggests ways larger companies can become more attractive suitors.
IBM Institute for Business Value study
Last updated: 09 Dec 2008
   Download complete IBM Institute for Business Value study ( 263KB )
Summary
Abstract
Related reports & papers

i
Summary

The number of major alliances between large biopharmaceutical companies and smaller biotech firms or academic institutes is soaring. Yet the latest bio-partnering study conducted by IBM and Silico Research shows that many life sciences companies still struggle to collaborate effectively. There are four steps such companies can take to enhance their appeal. They can capitalize on areas of existing expertise to attract new partners; "sweeten" an offer with non-financial incentives; adopt a project-oriented perspective; and develop the skills to engage in different kinds of partnerships.

Back to top
i
Abstract

The search for promising new medicines has produced numerous collaborations between large biopharmaceutical companies (Big Pharma) and their smaller brethren in the biotechnology (biotech) arena over the past decade. This trend has accelerated in recent years. The projected value of the "big-ticket" deals expected to take place in 2008 is US$45 billion, 50 percent more than the US$30 billion that changed hands in 2006.1

Moreover, there is no sign of any slowdown in interest, despite the new economic environment; 45 percent of the life sciences chief executives who participated in the IBM 2008 Global CEO Study plan to partner extensively over the next three years. Many large biopharmaceutical companies also have the financial strength to act on such plans.

The 2008 biopartnering survey conducted by IBM Global Business Services and Silico Research – the fifth to be conducted since 1999 – aims to assess how well large pharmaceutical and biotech companies interact with their partners. It also shows which large biopharmaceutical companies are currently considered the best partners as well as what small biotech firms and academic institutes look for when forming an alliance (see Figure).

Figure 1

The survey draws on the responses of 223 people from 209 commercial and academic organizations around the world.

This latest biopartnering survey shows that many large life sciences companies have made only marginal improvements in their ability to find new partners, negotiate terms and manage the alliances they established over the past two years. This suggests that they will have to raise their sights.

If they are to attract the best scientists, develop targeted treatments and services for patients with specific disease pathologies and move into new or emerging markets, they will have to collaborate even more extensively than they currently plan on doing. And the opportunities for doing so may now be more favorable than they have been in many years, as a growing number of cash-strapped biotech companies seek financial support. But that, in turn, means the industry leaders will have to hone their biopartnering skills, both to make themselves more appealing to potential partners with really exciting discoveries and to ensure that they attain their research goals.

So, what can large biopharmaceutical companies do to make themselves more alluring to potential partners, as the options for developing and commercializing medicines increase? IBM’s analysis suggests that there are four things companies need to do:

  • Start from a position of strength.
  • Search for the win-win.
  • Look after the "ABCs" of managing alliances.
  • Develop partnering skills throughout the extended enterprise.


To read the full report, download the PDF file at the top of this page.


Reference
1 "Trends in Big Ticket Alliances ($100m+) 1998-2007." Recap.com. 2008.

Back to top
i
About the authors
iHeather Fraser
Heather Fraser is a pharmacist with over 20 years of industry experience and has held positions within R&D, consultancy and community pharmacy.

iSalima Lin
Salima Lin is an Associate Partner and Global Business Advisor for the Life Sciences Practice of IBM Global Business Services.

iJulia Chang
Julia Chang is a Senior Managing Consultant in IBM Global Business Services, with over ten years of experience in industry and consulting.
Back to top
Related reports & papers

Application management services for telecommunications: Driving transformation and growth
Identifying what should be changed: How public officials and military leaders can choose wisely
Podcast Interview: Economic development in a Rubik's Cube world
Podcast interview: Human Resource Business Transformation Outsourcing
Reduce risk in business acquisitions and consolidation by better managing IT and infrastructure dependencies
Telecom switches emphasis: Preliminary analysis of the 2007 Telecom Industry Survey
The Innovation Paradox in the Telecom Industry
The Tangible Cultural Approach: A practical guide for change
Transforming the workforce: Seven keys to succeeding in a globally integrated world
Unlearn to innovate: Breaking patterns and getting rid of assumptions
Back to top

Download PDF  263KB
Get Adobe® Reader®
Printable version E-mail this page

We're here to help

Chat now
E-mail us

or call us at
1-800-IBM-7080
Mention 108AE08W


Subscription

RSS feed from IBM
Get business and IT insights from IBM Global Services, delivered direct to you via RSS

Podcast series
Listen to our executive reports at work or on the go

Subscribe to IdeaWatch
Sign up to receive monthly e-mail updates, including IBM Institute for Business Value studies and other fresh thinking from our consultants