 |
 |
|
 |
|  Trust and knowledge sharing: A critical combinationData from a two-part survey of 138 people in three companies were analysed to discern how trust affects knowledge sharing and how individuals evaluate the trustworthiness of others when seeking knowledge. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

Executive strategy report Last updated: 20 Mar 2003
 | Summary |  |
Recently, the IBM Institute for Knowledge-Based Organizations (IKO) studied the role of trust in knowledge sharing. Factors such as the strength of the relationship between the knowledge seeker and the knowledge source, the difference between competence-based and benevolence-based trust and the type of knowledge being exchanged were explored. Data from a two-part survey of 138 people in three companies were analysed to discern how trust affects knowledge sharing and how individuals evaluate the trustworthiness of others when seeking knowledge. By applying this new insight, managers can take explicit actions to help build trust -- and, in turn, encourage knowledge sharing. |
 | Analysis |  |
Introduction "How can I encourage people to share what they know?" is a question often posed by mangers in today's knowledge-driven organisations. Much of the academic and business literature, and personal experience, suggests that having employees work together over an extended period of time can lead to successful knowledge sharing. Yet, there exists little systematic evidence about why this actually promotes effective knowledge transfer. Without understanding the linkage between regular, ongoing employee interactions (commonly called 'strong ties') and effective knowledge sharing, managers often don't know what they can do to foster valuable knowledge exchanges. Should they co-locate people in a common work area? Should they send people on 'ropes courses' and ask them to discuss their innermost thoughts and feelings? Most of the research and advice in the marketplace provides little, if any, real guidance on these issues. To obtain a more robust understanding of the issues related to personal relationships and knowledge sharing, the IBM Institute for Knowledge-Based Organizations (IKO) conducted a survey of 138 employees from three companies: a division of a U.S. pharmaceutical company, a division of a British bank and a large group within a Canadian oil and gas company. All three groups were composed of people engaged in knowledge-intensive work, which anticipated a reliance on colleagues for information. The respondents were asked to consider a project on which they had recently worked and to rate the usefulness of the knowledge they received from those that they sought for advice on that project. The results of the survey -- which were similar across the three companies -- identified some action-oriented recommendations for companies looking to share knowledge across their organisations more effectively.1,2 To read the entire report, download the PDF file at the top of this page. |
 About the authors Lisa Abrams Lisa Abrams is the learning lead for Communications Sector Learning and Knowledge in IBM.
|
Rob Cross Rob Cross is an Assistant Professor at the University of Virginia's McIntire School of Commerce In Charlottesville, VA and a research fellow with the IBM Institute for Knowledge-Based Organizations (IKO).
|
Eric Lesser Eric Lesser, an executive consultant with the Institute for Knowledge-based Organizations, has consulted on a range of knowledge management issues to numerous companies in the legal, financial services, government and manufacturing industries.
|
Daniel Z. Levin Daniel Z. Levin is a faculty member in the Organization Management Department of Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University.
|
 |
| Related reports & papers |
|
|
| 1 | Abrams, L., R. Cross and D. Levin. "The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer." Institute for Knowledge-Based Organizations white paper, March 2002. | | 2 | "Why Should I Trust You? Antecedents of Trust in a Knowledge Transfer Context." Institute for Knowledge-Based Organizations white paper, May 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|