Skip to main content

Product Lifecycle Management -- Creating corporate assets or simply controlling engineering data?

IBM conducted a New Product Introduction (NPI) survey to assess the continued correlation between technology offerings and enhanced revenues. The results? A continuance of a decade-long trend. But, we also uncovered a fundamental shift in the selling of semiconductor products.
Executive strategy report
Last updated: 08 Aug 2003
Summary
Analysis
Related reports & papers

i
Summary
The semiconductor industry consists of a number of lines of business grouped around a common set of technologies. Yet, regardless of product orientation -- memory, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), microprocessor -- those capturing new market share have shifted from traditional Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) to the management of engineering intellectual property (IP) as a set of corporate assets. IBM conducted a New Product Introduction (NPI) survey to assess the continued correlation between technology offerings and enhanced revenues. The results? A continuance of a decade-long trend. But, we also uncovered a fundamental shift in the selling of semiconductor products.
Back to top
i
Analysis

Semiconductor companies are now offering design solutions rather than single products. Similar to financial institutions that categorised their offerings into sets of assets (for example, investment banking with financial planning) to create solutions, semiconductor companies are packaging sets of designs. Thus, the ability to offer semiconductor design solutions is being governed through asset management of engineering IP. Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) as it is defined today, both within and among enterprises, is a growing focus in the industry. Giga Information Group projects 20 percent growth in global PLM sales in 2003 to US$1.4 billion (excluding CAD/CAM sales).1 A recent CIMdata survey of 180 companies found that 84 percent were planning new design collaboration projects in the next 12 months and that 70 percent were planning to maintain or increase funding in this area.2

When evaluating the survey base, we focused on critical success factors linked to revenue growth and market share, including time to market, time to volume, process adherence and feature richness. We correlated a set of drivers to each success factor.

The results revealed interesting trends and gaps. In general, companies are mastering time-to-market concepts and thus are more comfortable outsourcing elements of their NPI cycles. Also, for those focused on IP categorisation, we noted new licensing revenues associated with the repackaging of older designs, enhanced IP reuse, a stronger portfolio and simplified outsourcing decisions. However, in meeting time-to-market projections, many still experience pitfalls, such as:

  • Failure to address design-manufacturing collaboration, undermining good time-to-market results with poor time-to-value results

  • Sacrifice of portfolio-management discipline, leading to either eliminating products late in their development cycles or releasing products that don't sell, and again yielding poor time-to-value results.

In the analysis, we correlated success factors and drivers to further detail industry needs and PLM activities associated with enhanced industry performance. The following areas were analysed:

  • Portfolio management -- including product selection, core product technology, and use of knowledge and IP

  • Process quality -- including cost, speed, flexibility, internal and external collaboration, and capacity planning and supply chain optimisation

  • Toolset integration -- including clarity of customer requirements.

To read the full report, download the pdf file at the top of this page.

Back to top
i
About the authors
iMarilyn Stemper
Marilyn Stemper, an IBM Business Consulting Services partner, leads the Collaborative Product Commerce practice in the western United States and also consults directly for Fortune 100 clients in the high-tech industry.
iDr. Peter Williams
Dr. Peter Williams is a director with IBM Business Consulting Services with experience in PLM issues and business-to-business collaboration stretching over more than ten years. He has worked with many Technology companies and also in the Defence and Aerospace sectors.
Back to top
Related reports & papers

In the future: learning will reshape our world at work, at home and at school
Japan Airlines: Building an e-business on IBM Technology
Learning: A key enabler to becoming an on demand organisation
Product provider to customer value provider: Escaping the services maze
Realising the business value of systems management with Linux-powered grid computing
Separating fantasy from reality: Identifying a viable, valuable wireless payment opportunity
Get Adobe® Reader®
Back to top

1Rugullies, Erica. "Market Overview: Collaborative Product Development." Giga Information Group. 20 November 2001.
2CIMData. "Late Breaking News." 22 October 2002.

Printable version E-mail this page

We're here to help

E-mail us

or call us at
1800 88 1155